NANCY M. RADFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
WALTER H. RADFORD, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1955-02-11
78 So. 2d 376 Florida Supreme Court (1955) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. Royal Auto. Grp., Inc., 675 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
    …nt when the parties reach agreement, intend to be bound by their agreement and intend that a subsequent writing will merely memorialize the transaction. The Supreme Court’s implicit recognition of this distinction came in Shaffer v. Previews, Inc., 78 So. 2d 376 (Fla.1955). There the plaintiff, Shaffer, sought to enforce an alleged oral agreement for payment of severance pay entered into between himself and Cymrot, attorney and treasurer for the defendant. Shaffer testified that the parties met, negotiated…
  • Radford v. Radford, 117 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960)
    …in the City of Jacksonville. Their father, Walter H. Radford, was granted a divorce in 1953 from the appellee by the Circuit Court for Duval County. This decree was affirmed without opinion by the Florida Supreme Court in Radford v. Radford, 1955, 78 So. 2d 376. The amended final decree of divorce ordered, among its many other provisions, that Rad-ford pay to the appellee “as alimony the sum of $35.00 per month * * This decree also contained the following two provisions critically important in the present…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw