KIRKLAND D. WILSON, APPELLANT,

v.

FLORIDA SUN DECK HOMES COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Luckhardt v. Pardieck, 142 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)
  …fferent rule prevails. See Lawson v. County Board of Public Instruction, 114 Fla. 153, 154 So. 170, 171, * * The motion of the appellants to review and modify the order and supersedeas bond was timely and properly made. Ritter v. Bentley, Fla.1955, 78 So. 2d 573 is not controlling, as that was an action on a super-sedeas bond which provided for the payment of attorney’s fees. Accordingly, that part of the order and supersedeas bond providing for attorney’s fees is stricken and it therefore follows that the…
• Linick v. Lamm, 143 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
  …appellant as a part of the expense of an appeal from a final decree. Bernstein v. Bernstein, Fla.1949, 43 So. 2d 356; Larson v. Higginbotham, Fia.1953, 66 So. 2d 40. It is our view that this rule has not been changed by Ritter v. Bentley, Fla.1955, 78 So. 2d 573, inasmuch as the holding in that case is confined by the opinion to an action by a plaintiff upon a defaulted bond. Accordingly, the motion is granted and the condition that the appellant pay attorney’s fee is stricken from the order and the bond.…
• Rosenhouse v. Kimbrig, 147 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)
  …al is denied. It is noted that the order fixing the terms and conditions of the super-sedeas bond and the bond itself have already made provision for attorney’s fees which may be incurred by appellees in this appeal. See Ritter v. Bentley, Fla.1955, 78 So. 2d 573. The decree appealed from is affirmed. WHITE, J., and WILLIS, BEN C., Associate Judge, concur.…