STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
WILLIAM R. OMASTA, JR., RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
WILLIAM R. OMASTA, JR., RESPONDENT
342 So. 2d 505
Florida Supreme Court (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND and KARL, JJ., concur. BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Florida BAR v. Baron, 392 So. 2d 1318 (Fla. 1981)…, respondent refunded the fees. The referee found that in both instances respondent violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4), 6-101(A)(3), and 7-101(A)(2). Taking into consideration the respondent’s past disciplinary record, The Florida Bar v. Baron, 342 So. 2d 505 (Fla.1977), the referee recommended a public reprimand. Case No. 58273 The referee found that in October, 1975, respondent undertook representation of Norma G. Andrade, who had a dissolution proceeding pending and whose house had just been severel…1 / 2
-
THE Florida BAR v. Baron, 408 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1982)…. Count II: DR 5-105(A), 5-105(B), and 2-106(A). Count III: DR 1-102(A)(4) and Fla.Bar Integr. Rule, art. XI, rule 11.02(4). . One continuance had already been granted. . Florida Bar v. Baron, 392 So. 2d 1318 (Fla.1981); Florida Bar in re Baron, 342 So. 2d 505 (Fla.1977).…