OSCAR PATTERSON, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT),
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE (STATE)

Fla. 1st DCA | 1976-12-14
No. AA-185
MILLS, Acting C. J., McCORD, J., and DRURY, ARVEL, Associate Judge, concur.
342 So. 2d 515 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT.

Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we find no reversible error. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Although the defendant assigned as error the denial of his motion for a directed judgment of acquittal, he did not argue this assignment in his brief, therefore, abandoned it. We, therefore, have not considered the issue raised by this motion.

MILLS, Acting C. J., McCORD, J., and DRURY, ARVEL, Associate Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Huffman v. Moore, 834 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
    …denial of his petition on the merits and therefore we deem any challenges to this denial waived. See e.g. State v. Town of Sweetwater, 112 So. 2d 852, 854 (Fla.1959); State v. Mitchell, 719 So. 2d 1245, 1247 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Patterson v. State, 342 So. 2d 515, 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); J.A.B. Enterprises v. Gibbons, 596 So. 2d 1247, 1250 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The appellant does, however, challenge the fact that our previous order enforcing the mandate was not fully complied with by the circuit court. When…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw