ROBERT BERRY, APPELLANT,
v.
BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's summary judgment, finding no genuine issue of material fact.
Appellant sued the appellee for breach of an employment contract. The appellee raised several defenses and moved for summary judgment, which the trial…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Judgment As A Matter Of Law cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Robert Berry, sued appellee, Board of Public Instruction of Dade County, seeking damages for an alleged breach of an employment contract between the parties.
The Board answered appellant’s Amended Complaint. Among the numerous defenses alleged in the answer were waiver, estoppel, laches and failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Following the settlement of the issues, the Board filed a motion for summary judgment supported by affidavits and other exhibits.
Upon hearing, the trial court found that there was no genuine issue of material fact to be tried and the Board was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Thereupon the summary final judgment was entered. In this appeal appellant contends that the trial court erred in its application of the appropriate law and consequently erred in granting the Board’s motion for summary judgment.
A careful examination of the record on appeal conclusively establishes the absence of any genuine triable issue of material fact and that appellee was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed.
Affirmed.