DELMAR GLENN FLYNN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
DELMAR GLENN FLYNN
STATE OF FLORIDA
155 Fla. 751
Florida Supreme Court (1945)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 21 So. 2d 361
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from a conviction of rape. The only question is the sufficiency of the evidence. We have studied the records and briefs and see no'reason to overturn the jury’s verdict which has been approved by the trial judge.
Affirmed.
CHAPMAN, C. J.,..TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chames v. DeMAYO, 972 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 2007)…erms the exemption does not apply to mortgaged property. See art. X, § 4(c), Fla. Const. (“The owner of homestead real estate, joined by the spouse if married, may alienate the homestead by mortgage .... ”); see also Howard v. Calhoun, 155 Fla. 689, 21 So. 2d 361, 362 (1945) (“We have long recognized that property exempt. under Article X of the Constitution, whether real property or personal property, can be sold or mortgaged by the owner ... just as any other property.”). The question here is whether a home…
-
McKESSON & Robbins, Inc. v. Taft St. Shopping Ctr., 184 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)…uch property upon the leased premises. Accordingly, the lien of McKesson & Robbins by virtue of its judgment is subject to the claim for rent due Taft Street Shopping Center. Lovett v. Lee, 141 Fla. 395, 193 So. 538; Howard v. Calhoun, 155 Fla. 689, 21 So. 2d 361 at page 364. The fact that Taft Street Shopping Center claimed in its distress suit only a part of the rent due is immaterial. All property of the Silver Drug upon the premises was subject to the rent lien of Taft Street Shopping Center even though…