JERRY LEE FRAZIER, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT),
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE (STATE)
MILLS, Judge.
By its opinion of 20 August 1976, 336 So. 2d 435, the Court remanded this case to the trial court for the purpose of inquiring into the circumstances surrounding the State’s failure to furnish the name of a rebuttal witness in response to Frazier’s discovery demand, and for the purpose of determining whether the noncompliance of the State with this rule of procedure resulted in prejudice to Frazier. The trial court has properly inquired into the circumstances and has entered an order that no prejudice resulted to Frazier. We have reviewed the record provided us by the trial court and agree.
Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
BOYER, Chief Judge, and McCORD, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lonergan v. Est. OF Ethel L. Budahazi, 669 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)…the burden of introducing competent substantial evidence in order to overcome this presumption. In re: Estate of Sangenito, 631 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Schultz v. Estate of Roach, 549 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); In re: Estate of Baird, 343 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). The question presented in the instant case is whether the wife’s daughter, Wilbright, presented competent substantial evidence to rebut the presumption that the wife had deliberately destroyed her 1992 will. The term “competent…
-
In the Estate OF Arlethia Parson v. Hendley, 416 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)…Estate, 56 So. 2d 545 (Fla.1952); Upson v. Estate of Carville, 369 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). The presumption may only be overcome by competent and substantial evidence, the lack of which requires a finding of revocation. In re Estate of Baird, 343 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). (Proof of nonrevocation in a proceeding to establish a lost or destroyed will is the subject of an annotation in 3 A.L.R.2d beginning at page 949.) Appellant argues that evidence of the fact that “persons with adverse interest…
-
Dorothy Walton & Rodger Walton v. The Est. OF Mary E. Walton, 601 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…hat a lost will has been destroyed included intestacy heirs inquiring about certain deeds belonging to decedent, having access to decedent’s home, and an opportunity to destroy the will); Estate of Parson, 416 So. 2d at 515; In re of Baird’s Estate, 343 So. 2d 41, 43 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). In concluding that the trial court erred in denying appellants’ petition to establish the lost or destroyed will, we reviewed the circumstances surrounding the will’s execution, as well as what happened in the months preced…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Rodriguez v. Brown, 336 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
- Frazier v. State, 336 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)