DOROTHY FLEISCHER AND MAX FLEISCHER, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
HAROLD SLIMER, DOING BUSINESS AS "SLIMER'S RESORT WEAR", DEFENDANT
DOROTHY FLEISCHER AND MAX FLEISCHER, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS,
HAROLD SLIMER, DOING BUSINESS AS "SLIMER'S RESORT WEAR", DEFENDANT
79 So. 2d 785
Florida Supreme Court (1955)
Caution
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The certificate in the above cause is not within the contemplation of Rule 27 of this Court, 30 F.S.A., which became effective March 15, 1955. See Schwob Co. of Florida v. Florida Industrial Commission, 152 Fla. 203, 11 So. 2d 782.
MATHEWS, C. J.;-' and THOMAS, HOBSON and DREW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Paul Smith Constr. Co. v. Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 93 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 1957)…ascertain the physical condition of the claimant, the fact remains that the employee was restored to the payroll on a full salary basis but with the privilege of doing relatively light work. In Townsley v. Miami Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., Fla.1955, 79 So. 2d 785, 788, we held that payment of the full salary under such circumstances was the equivalent of “ ‘payment of compensation’ ” within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation law. We there held that such salary payments could be regarded by the employe…
-
Ringling BROS.-BARNUM & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Jones, 134 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 1961)…r v. United States Sugar Corporation, 148 Fla. 537, 4 So. 2d 692; Sargent v. Evening Independent, Fla.1952, 62 So. 2d 58, Ferlita v. Florida Art Stucco Corporation, Fla. 1954, 74 So. 2d 893; Townsley v. Miami Roofing & Sheet Metal Company, Fla.1955, 79 So. 2d 785; Virginian, Inc. v. Ponder, Fla.1954, 72 So. 2d 781, and Wick Roofing Company v. Curtis, Fla.1959, 110 So. 2d 385, to support this contention. We have examined these cases and we do not think any of them rules the case at bar. The main question in…
-
City OF ST. Augustine & Travelers Ins. Co. v. Allen, 404 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)…ewhere judicial decisions have ameliorated that bar by postponing the limitation period during the time the employer pays the employee his wages in lieu of compensation payable under Chapter 440. E. g., Townsley v. Miami Roofing and Sheet Metal Co., 79 So. 2d 785 (Fla.1955); Chemstrand Co. v. Enfinger, 231 So. 2d 816 (Fla.1970). Deciding that wages were paid in lieu of compensation, or not, and by that conception granting or barring as stale otherwise meritorious compensation claims, is a hazardous rational…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Schwob Co. of Fla. v. Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 152 Fla. 203 (Fla. 1942)