CHARLES LEROY LANE

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• Martin Co. & Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Drucella Carpenter & Fla. Indus. Comm'n, 132 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 1961)
  …doctrine in Czepial not to be controlling. Rather, the doctrine of Firestone governs this issue and, as already noted, we find the distinction between Firestone and this case to be immaterial. In City of Tallahassee v. Roberts, 1945, 155 Fla. 815, 21 So. 2d 712, a case involving spondylolisthesis, this Court denied a claim for compensation because of lack of proof of “accident” although the onset of pain became severe when claimant, a fireman, jumped out of bed to answer an alarm. In that case the claimant…
• S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. McCOOK, 355 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 1977)
  …preceded by some incident, such as a slip, fall or blow.” The fact that McCook’s condition was sudden and unexpected distinguishes this case from Martin Co. v. Carpenter, 132 So. 2d 400 (Fla.1961), and City of Tallahassee v. Roberts, 155 Fla. 815, 21 So. 2d 712 (1945), in both of which cases the employee’s painful condition had been a known and continuing fact. This case is more like Simmons v. City of Coral Gables, 186 So. 2d 493 (Fla.1966), where it was shown that a pre-existing knee condition suddenly b…
• Gray v. Emp'rs Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 64 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1952)
  …failure to prove a direct causal connection between the employment and the injury. . The same failure of proof existed-in the cases of Cleary Bros. Const. Co. v. Nobles, 156. Fla. 408, 23 So. 2d 525, and City of Tallahassee v. Roberts, 155 Fla. 815, 21 So. 2d 712, relied upon by appellees in support of their contention that appellant was not injured “by accident.” The cases of McNeill v. Thompson, Fla., 53 So. 2d 868, and Peterson v. City Commission, City of Jacksonville, Fla., 44 So. 2d 423, are much closer…

  ← 1 / 2 →