J. C. KELLOW
v.
CARL G. ROSE AND NORMAN HORNE, CO-PARTNERS DOING BUSINESS AS ROSE & HORNE, ET AL.
J. C. KELLOW
CARL G. ROSE AND NORMAN HORNE, CO-PARTNERS DOING BUSINESS AS ROSE & HORNE, ET AL.
155 Fla. 823
Florida Supreme Court (1945)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 21 So. 2d 788
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff recovered a verdict in an action wherein one Claude Cox was alleged to be the agent of the appellee, Rose and Horne, and while in the course of such agency inflicted injury to plaintiff by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle.
The verdict was set aside and a new trial awarded because the evidence was insufficient to prove the agency.
From our study of the record we are unable to say the trial court abused its discretion so the judgment is affirmed.
CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilson v. Fla. Nat. Bank & Tr. Co. at Miami, 64 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 1953)…for the debts of the head of the family which the homestead enjoyed during decedent’s lifetime continues to exist for the benefit of the widow and lineal descendants. Hinson v. Booth, as Execeutors, etc., 39 Fla. 333, 22 So. 687; Nesmith v. Nesmith, 155 Fla. 823, 21 So. 2d 789. Counsel for Mrs. Fuchs summarizes his contentions by saying: that any claim of homestead in the thirty-five acres was entirely dependent upon the.home place, the title to which was jointly held by the husband and wife, as tenants by…