LAWRENCE HAYES, APPELLANT,

v.

METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Glassman v. State, 377 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …d the remaining contentions raised by the defendant on this appeal and find them to be without merit. Resnick v. State, 287 So. 2d 24 (Fla.1973); State v. King, 282 So. 2d 162 (Fla.1973); Sanders v. State, 73 So. 2d 292 (Fla.1954); Francis v. State, 343 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); White v. State, 324 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Maycock v. State, 284 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Green v. State, 190 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Casso v. State, 182 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966); § 775.011(2), Fla.Stat.…
• Lockhart v. State, 384 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
  …is well established that defense counsel has no right to demand or inspect a written memorandum or report, for cross-examination purposes, when that memorandum or [*292] report is not used by the witness while on the witness stand. Francis v. State, 343 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1977); Marshall v. State, 321 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Williams v. State, 208 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1968). An entirely different result would occur, however, in those cases where the witness testifies with the aid of notes or…
• Jones v. State, 355 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …s case, no error is shown as statements made by defense counsel in opening and closing arguments invited the prosecutor’s comments. See Whitney v. State, 132 So. 2d 599 (Fla.1961); Ricks v. State, 242 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Francis v. State, 343 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

• 6551 Collins Ave. Corp. v. Beverlee Millen, 104 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 1958)
• Manis v. Leamon Lee Miller, 327 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
• O'Brien v. O'Brien, 155 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)