IN RE: ESTATE OF DANIEL ROBERT KNIGHT, DECEASED
On authority of North, et al., v. Ringling and Ringling v. North, et al., 149 Fla. 739, 7 So. (2nd) 476, the judgment of the Circuit Court affirming the judgment of the county judge’s court is
Reversed.
TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and SE-BRING, JJ., concur.
BUFORD, C. J., and ADAMS, J., dissent.
ON REHEARING
A rehearing having been granted in this cause and the case having been further considered upon the record and upon briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, it is thereupon ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the circuit court in this cause be and is reversed and such reversal is hereby re-affirmed and adhered to on rehearing.
TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur!
BUFORD, C. J., BROWN and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.
PER CURIAM:
A rehearing having been granted in this cause and the case having been further considered upon the record and upon briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, it is thereupon ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment of the circuit court in this cause be and is reversed and such reversal is hereby re-affirmed and adhered to on rehearing.
TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur!
BUFORD, C. J., BROWN and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Escarra v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 131 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1961)…if the result is justified on any other ground appearing in the record. In Re Freeman’s Petition, Fla., 84 So. 2d 544; Haas v. Crisp Realty Co., Fla., 65 So. 2d 765; Cottages, Miami Beach, Inc. v. Wegman, Fla., 57 So. 2d 439; In Re Knight’s Estate, 155 Fla. 869, 22 So. 2d 249; Sherlock v. Varn, 64 Fla. 447, 59 So. 953. In order to give effect to this well established rule we have carefully examined the record and it appears that the deputy specifically found as a matter of fact that the reason the claiman…
-
City of Miami v. Bd. of Pub. Instruction of Dade Cnty., 72 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1954)…o the specific reasons assigned therefor, in -determining whether reversible error has been committed.” State ex rel. Bergin v. Dunne, Fla., 71 So. 2d 746, 748, and cases cited; Sheridan v. Respess, 147 Fla. 626, 3 So. 2d 704; In re Knight’s Estate, 155 Fla. 869, 22 So. 2d 249. It is an elementary rule of construction that “a statute is not to be given a retrospective effect, unless its terms show clearly that such an effect was intended.” In re Seven Barrels of Wine, 79 Fla. 1‘, 83 So. 627, 632. Accord Cr…
-
Mervin J. Boylston v. Dales, 190 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966)…[*207] PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See In re Knight’s Estate, 1945, 155 Fla. 869, 22 So. 2d 249. SMITH, C. J., WALDEN, J., and FUS-SELL, CARROLL W., Associate Judge, concur.…