E. LAMAR BAILEY AND ERNEST BAILEY, D/B/A E. LAMAR BAILEY ASSOCIATES, A PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANTS,
v.
ELBERT C. ROBINSON AND BERNA COTTEN ROBINSON, HIS WIFE, ET AL., APPELLEES; E. LAMAR BAILEY AND ERNEST BAILEY, D/B/A E. LAMAR BAILEY ASSOCIATES, A PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANTS, V. NATHAN LEO LINZY AND PATRICIA J. LINZY, APPELLEES
E. LAMAR BAILEY AND ERNEST BAILEY, D/B/A E. LAMAR BAILEY ASSOCIATES, A PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANTS,
ELBERT C. ROBINSON AND BERNA COTTEN ROBINSON, HIS WIFE, ET AL., APPELLEES; E. LAMAR BAILEY AND ERNEST BAILEY, D/B/A E. LAMAR BAILEY ASSOCIATES, A PARTNERSHIP, APPELLANTS, V. NATHAN LEO LINZY AND PATRICIA J. LINZY, APPELLEES
344 So. 2d 930
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, the orders appealed are affirmed and the case of E. Lamar Bailey and Ernest Bailey, d/b/a E. Lamar Bailey Associates v. Nathan Leo Linzy and Patricia J. Linzy is remanded to the trial court for a jury trial on the claim for damages made by Nathan Leo Linzy and Patricia J. Linzy against E. Lamar Bailey and Ernest Bailey, d/b/a E. Lamar Bailey Associates.
BOYER, C. J., and MILLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Elbert C. Robinson and Verna Cotten Robinson v. Bailey, 370 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)…. Robinson and Jennie Stewart Robinson, his wife, and Rosalie Robinson Gordon-Mills shall go hence without day.” (e. s.) The foregoing was a final judgment as to the Robinsons. That judgment was affirmed on appeal by this Court. Bailey v. Robinson, 344 So. 2d 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). A year after final judgment, the Linzys moved, pursuant to Rule 1.540, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, for amendment of the final judgment to include the Linzy’s claim for indemnity and damages against the Robinsons. The moti…