A. W., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Rosman Charles Diejuste v. Davis, 400 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …o dealt with before the master and not adjudicated by the judgment of August 9, 1972, the parties are at liberty to litigate them in other separate proceedings. An exception to the rule was apparently made by the court in Orr v. John Couture, Inc., 345 So. 2d 394 (Fla.3d DCA 1977) where action by the court itself in the dissolution proceeding precluded the disposition there of the wife’s claims to certain property. In Mariness v. Sirilo, 310 So. 2d 760 (Fla.2d DCA 1975) conduct of the wife at the time of th…
• Wooten v. Nichola Rhodus, 470 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
  …ion suit. It would now be manifestly unjust to allow her to claim res judicata in the partition suit — on the ground the dissolution court should have heard the matter. Robertson v. Robertson, 61 So. 2d 499 (Fla.1952); See Orr v. John Couture, Inc., 345 So. 2d 394 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1977), cert. denied, 355 So. 2d 515 (Fla.1978). Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment and remand this cause to the trial court for determination of Wooten’s equitable claim, on the merits. The trial court may rely upon the eviden…
• Malek v. Malek (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)
  …hin its authority to order the husband to transfer to the wife stock in the company owned by him, was not empowered to order the transfer of the assets of a corporation which was not a party to the litigation). Compare, Orr v. John Couture, Inc., 345 So. 2d 394, 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (“In the prior dissolution of marriage action, in which the corporation was not a party, the wife sought to establish 7 equitable ownership in the corporation, and the trial court held the wife had no interes…

Authorities Cited

• State v. D. H., 340 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 1976)
• R. D. C. v. State, 332 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)