KELSON DEANZEL MCKINNEY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KELSON DEANZEL MCKINNEY, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
345 So. 2d 398
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1977)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See; State v. Dwyer, 317 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Smith v. State, 292 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & FOX, M.D., P.A., 413 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…quiring them to make discovery, is void for the failure of the order to contain findings that the alleged contemnors had the present ability to comply with the underlying discovery orders. Garo v. Garo, 347 So. 2d 418 (Fla.1977); Epstein v. Epstein, 345 So. 2d 398 (Fla.3d DCA 1977). Reversed.…
-
Grapin & Chaykin, M.D., P.A. v. Turnoff & FOX, M.D., P.A., 416 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…ng them to make discovery, is void for the failure of the order to contain findings that the alleged contemnors had the present ability to comply with the underlying discovery orders. Garo v. Garo, 347 So. 2d 418, 419 (Fla.1977); Epstein v. Epstein, 345 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Reversed. We recognize that our opinion of affirmance conflicts with the holding in Grapin & Chaykin v. Turnoff & Fox, supra, therefore, rehearing is granted and our opinion in this case is vacated. Upon rehearing we hold that…
Authorities Cited
- Burt Smith v. State, 292 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
- State v. Dwyer, 317 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)