DOROTHY JACKSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida Supreme Court affirmed a criminal contempt conviction of a juror who brought unauthorized newspaper clippings into jury deliberations, holding that Section 38.22, Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840 constitutionally permit contempt proceedings without jury trial.
A juror may be convicted of criminal contempt without a jury trial for violating a trial judge's admonition against bringing unauthorized materials into jury deliberations.
[1] A juror may be convicted of criminal contempt without a jury trial for violating a trial judge's admonition against introducing unauthorized materials into jury deliberat…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDorothy Jackson, a juror in a criminal case, brought two newspaper clippings containing information relevant to the case into jury deliberations contr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jury Trial Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
OVERTON, Chief Justice.
We review this conviction for criminal contempt on direct appeal from a decision of the Hillsborough County Circuit Court upholding the constitutionality of Section 38.22, Florida Statutes. We have jurisdiction.1
Contrary to the instructions of the trial judge the appellant brought into petit jury deliberations in a criminal case two newspaper clippings containing information relevant to the case before it. She showed these clippings to other members of the jury. One of the jury members reported the incident to the court. Following a petition by the prosecutor, the court ordered appellant to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court for violation of its admonition.
After hearing the matter, the court found her in criminal contempt of court, sentenced her to ninety days in jail, and suspended the sentence in its entirety.
Appellant contends she was entitled to a trial by jury. That issue has been answered in Aaron v. State, 345 So. 2d 641 (Fla.1977). Appellant was not entitled to a jury trial, and Section 38.22, Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840, under which her contempt hearing proceeded, were constitutionally applied. Aaron v. State, supra.
Appellant’s remaining allegations are without merit.
Affirmed.
ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUND-BERG, HATCHETT and ROBERTS (Retired), JJ., concur. . Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla.Const.