STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,

v.

LUCKIE STRADTMAN, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Borges v. State, 415 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 1982)
  …1976); Jenkins v. Wainwright, 322 So. 2d 477 (Fla.1975); Estevez v. State, 313 So. 2d 692 (Fla.1975); Foster v. State, 286 So. 2d 549 (Fla.1973); Cone v. State, 285 So. 2d 12 (Fla.1973); Williams v. State, 337 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), aff’d, 346 So. 2d 67 (Fla.1977); Swyers v. State, 334 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Panzavecchia v. State, 311 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Yost v. State, 243 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes (1977), provides: Whoever, in the cour…
• Jaggers v. State, 536 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
  …statement to the police. Brown was the key prosecution witness because she was the only witness to the shooting other than Williams. Thus, her credibility was a crucial issue. In Stradtman v. State, 334 So. 2d 100, 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), approved, 346 So. 2d 67 (Fla.1977), the Third District Court of Appeal held: [I]t is a well recognized rule that limiting the scope of cross-examination in a manner which keeps from the jury relevant and important facts bearing on the trustworthiness of crucial testimony…
• Johnson v. State, 366 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1978)
  …e temporal distinction demonstrated the separate and distinct nature of the two crimes. Ray cannot have overruled Cone any more than Estevez or Jenkins did. The holdings in Estevez and Jenkins were “reaffirmed” by our decision in Williams v. State, 346 So. 2d 67 (Fla.1977). We there adopted the decision of the district court of appeal, 337 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), and specifically overruled Panzavecchia v. State, 311 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). The two offenses in Panzavecchia were first degree m…

Authorities Cited

• Cumbie v. State, 345 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1977)
• Luckie Stradtman v. State, 334 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)