INDIAN RIVER FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, A UNITED STATES CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

SHERRILL WHITE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE ASSETS OF R I VERO BEACH, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, BANKRUPT, ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Quinn v. Truman Alan Millard, 358 So. 2d 1378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …ate review unless both clearly erroneous and prejudicial to the opposing party. Myers v. Korbly, 103 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958); Upchurch v. Barnes, 197 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967) and cases cited therein; Warning Safety Lights, Inc. v. Gallor, 346 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) and cases cited therein. Since no such strong infirmities appear, this court will not disturb the trial court’s ruling that Officer Dixon qualified as an expert witness. It does not necessarily follow that his opinions were prope…
• The Green Cos. v. Divincenzo, 432 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …in. The third point urges error in the sustaining of an objection to a question propounded by the defendants’ counsel to the plaintiffs’ expert witness on security.2 If error was committed, it was harmless. See Warning Safety Lights, Inc. v. Gallor, 346 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 355 So. 2d 518 (Fla.1978). This is especially true in view of the competent evidence which had already been presented on the subject. Finally, the defendants urge that the verdict was excessive. A party who assails…
• N. Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Rolanda Johnson, 538 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
  …ular instance in question. Moreover, “the trial judge must of necessity be granted a great deal of discretion in ruling upon the qualifications of expert witnesses and the propriety of the questions expounded.” Warning Safety Lights, Inc. v. Gallor, 346 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Thus, it has not been demonstrated that the trial court’s ruling on this question was reversible error. The second point presented by the hospital, the doctor and the Fund is whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury…