RUTH GREENBERG, APPELLANT,
v.
MARVIN COLLINS, JR., AND BENJAMIN T. THARPE, D/B/A FLAGSTONE MOTOR COURT, A PARTNERSHIP, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment, finding the issues raised on appeal to be unsubstantial and squarely within established precedent. The court granted the motion to affirm.
The questions raised on appeal are unsubstantial and do not require further argument, as they fall within established precedent.
“Aside from any ruling in' respect to the many errors appearing in compilation .of the briefs of appellant in direct violation of Rules 34(1), 36(1), 36(5)" (a) and (c), and 36(6) (b), (c) and (d), Supreme Court Rules, 30 F.S.A., it appears' that the cause comes squarely within the rule of Miller v. Shull, Fla., 1950, 48 So. 2d 521, which has been followed by this Court without deviation.”
This quote establishes the court's reasoning for affirming the decision, highlighting both the appellant's briefing errors and the case's alignment with existing precedent.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellant, Ruth Greenberg, appealed a judgment from a lower court. The appellees, Marvin Collins, Jr., and Benjamin T. Tharpe, moved to affirm the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DREW, Chief Justice.
Aside from any ruling in' respect to the many errors appearing in compilation .of the briefs of appellant in direct violation of Rules 34(1), 36(1), 36(5)“ (a) and (c), and 36(6) (b), (c) and (d), Supreme Court Rules, 30 F.S.A., it appears' that the cause comes squarely within the rule of Miller v. Shull, Fla., 1950, 48 So. 2d 521, which has been followed by this Court without deviation. Breau v. Whitmore, Fla., 1952, 59 So. 2d 748; Andrews v. Narber, Fla., 1952, 59 So. 2d 869. Accordingly, it is plain that the questions raised on which the decision of the cause depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument. Rule 38(1), Supreme Court. Rules.
The motion to affirm the judgment is granted. And the judgment appealed from-; is hereby affirmed; -- " '
TERRELL, SEBRING. and ROBERTS, JJ-, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Miller v. Shull, 48 So.2d 521 (Fla. 1950)
- Breau v. Whitmore, 59 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 1952)
- Andrews v. Narber, 59 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1952)