TED HOWELL, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
TED HOWELL, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
347 So. 2d 430
Florida Supreme Court (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Florida BAR v. Marcus, 616 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 1993)…ly, in a case where three years elapsed between the filing of charges and oral argument before the Court, we placed the attorney on probation for two years rather than suspending him for two years as the referee recommended. The Fla. Bar v. Kaufman, 347 So. 2d 430 (Fla.1977). We explained that the “respondent has had time to evaluate his conduct and has experienced personal and professional detriment” during those three years. Id. at 432. In the instant case, Marcus has had time to reflect upon his own condu…