TISDALE'S SANITARY SERVICE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Wait v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 372 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1979)
  …nd work product are not exempted from the Public Records Act.1 We accepted jurisdiction of this cause to resolve the conflict between the decision of the First District in the present case and the decision of the Fourth District in Clark v. Walton, 347 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), which held that the automatic stay provision of rule 5.12(1) takes precedence over the conflicting language of section 119.11(2). We resolve that conflict by approving the holding of the Fourth District in Clark and quashing the…
• Wait v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 353 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …utomatic stay. Section 119.11(2). A stay order shall not be issued unless the court determines that there is a substantial probability that opening the records for inspection will result in significant damage. Section 119.11(3). In Clark v. Walton, 347 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), it was held that whether a public agency taking an appeal need obtain a stay order is procedural, therefore Rule 5.12(1) takes precedence over Section 119.-11(2). The statement of the law in Clark is accurate but we do not reach…
• Boutwell v. Nichol's Alley OF Jacksonville, Inc., 364 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …tomatic stay. Section 119.11(2). A stay order shall not be issued unless the court determines that there is a substantial probability that opening the records for inspection will result in significant damage. Section 119.11(3). “In Clark v. Walton, 347 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), it was held that whether a public agency taking an appeal need obtain a stay order is procedural, therefore Rule 5.12(1) takes precedence over Section 119.11(2). The statement of the law in Clark is accurate but we do not reach…

Authorities Cited

• N. Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber, 143 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1962)