JAMES RAY BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The only point raised in this appeal is the failure of the judgment and sentence to reflect with specificity whether defendant was adjudicated guilty of robbery under Section 812.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes, or under Section 812.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Although defendant was charged with robbery in violation of Section 812.13, it is asserted that there was no evidence of any deadly weapon. Section 812.13(2)(a) refers to “firearm or other deadly weapon.” Section 812.13(2)(b) refers to “weapon” only. Different penalties are provided under each section. The judgment and sentence merely makes reference to “robbery,” and the sentence imposed does not give any indication as to whether the judgment and sentence was intended to reflect a violation of Section 812.13(2)(a) or 812.13(2)(b). Accordingly, this cause is remanded to the trial court for the sole purpose of correcting the judgment and sentence to specify the applicable degree of felony. See Hickman v. State, 347 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).
MAGER, C. J., and ALDERMAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Noble v. Yorke, 490 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 1986)…the dog upon a theory [*32] of common law liability. Id. at 1112; see also Flick v. Malino, 356 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Leave to amend shall be freely given. Associated Television and Communications Inc. v. Dutch Village Mobile Homes, Ltd., 347 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). The fact that the trial court denied plaintiffs’ request for leave to amend for the wrong reason leads us to conclude that the trial court erred in denying plaintiffs’ request. However, in light of the conflicting evidence prese…
-
Fabbiano v. Demings, 91 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)…e” set forth in the original pleading. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.190 cmt. Relation Back (1967). We think the proper interpretation of rule 1.190 is set forth in Associated Television & Communications, Inc. v. Dutch Village Mobile Homes of Melbourne, Ltd., 347 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). There, the court adopted this explanation of the rule: Thus, as we view it, the proper test of relation back of amendments is not whether the cause of action stated in the amended pleading is identical to that stated in the ori…
-
Dirk Berkman v. Walt Foley and Mary Foley, 709 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…hady, 702 So. 2d 1289, 1291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (addition of party relates back where new and former parties have identity of interest that does not prejudice opponent); Associated Television and Comm. Inc. v. Dutch Village Homes of Melbourne, Ltd., 347 So. 2d 746, 748 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). 3. The contract is not fatally ambiguous as to the identity of the contracting party who would build the structure and who would thus be entitled to payment. Although the contracting party in question is stated on the firs…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Carlwin Lavern Hickman v. State, 347 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)