STATE OF FLORIDA, ON THE RELATION OF IVEY H. SMITH, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF IVEY H. SMITH COMPANY,

v.

J. M. LEE, AS COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Spangler v. Fla. State Tpk. Auth., 106 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 1958)
  …he revised statutes and the subsequent adoption of the revisions by the Legislature. We have held that under these circumstances this court will not undertake to explore alleged defects in the title to the original act. State ex rel. Badgett v. Lee, 156 Fla. 291, 22 So. 2d 804; Thompson v. Intercounty Tel. & Tel. Co., Fla.1952, 62 So. 2d 16; Rodriguez v. Jones, Fla.1953, 64 So. 2d 278. Regardless of the reasons assigned by the trial judge we, nonetheless, find that his ultimate conclusion sustaining the mo…
• Buchanan v. State of Fla. & Nathan Mayo, 111 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)
  …aws of Florida (namely, Chapter 801 of Florida Statutes 1955, and Florida Statutes 1957, F.S.A.), whether the insufficiency has been adjudicated or not, under the doctrine recognized and followed by our Supreme Court in State ex rel. Badgett v. Lee, 156 Fla. 291, 22 So. 2d 804, and other cases. We now turn our attention to the question whether the Child Molester Act violated Article III, Section 16, of the Florida Constitution by failing to reenact and publish at length the sections of the statutes amended…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Rodriguez v. Jones, 64 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 1953)
  …where a statute is re-enacted in a general revision of the laws, an origirial imperfection in title is cured by such re-enactment. Christopher v. Mungen, 61 Fla. 513, 55 So. 273; Carlton v. State, 63 Fla. 1, 58 So. 486; State ex rel. Badgett v. Lee, 156 Fla. 291, 22 So. 2d 804. The appellant’s contention that the 1951 Act, Chapter 26484, did not adopt and re-enact those statutes appearing in the book labelled “Volume 2” of the Florida Statutes 1951, which volume contains, inter alia, Chapter's 500-959 of ó…