DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES (NOW SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SERVICES) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

IN THE INTEREST OF M. V. W., A CHILD, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Brooker v. State, 362 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
  …of the trial court. However, we agree with appellant that there are imperfections in his sentence. The present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1977), requires. Knight v. State, 349 So. 2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Knight v. State, supra. Therefore, we remand the case for correction of the sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time. BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and S…
• Vanorman v. State, 360 So. 2d 802 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
  …PER CURIAM. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, the present sentence contains the phrase “hard labor” which is improper. Knight v. State, 349 So. 2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). We remand the case for correction of sentence. Appellant need not be present at that time. HOBSON, Acting C. J., and BOARD-MAN and OTT, JJ., concur.…
• Maerkle v. State, 362 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
  …PER CURIAM. The trial court failed to specify the exact amount of credit appellant is to receive for time served. Therefore, we remand this case with instructions that it now do so. Knight v. State, 349 So. 2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Appellant need not be present for this purpose. BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

• Fla. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. In the Interest of R. M. A., 327 So. 2d 844 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
• J. E. R. v. State, 317 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
• Perrin Shappley, Jr. v. State, 317 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)