LUMBERMANS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
LUMBERMANS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, APPELLANT,
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
349 So. 2d 638
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1977)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Roth v. Old Republic Insurance Co., 269 So. 2d 3 (Fla.1972).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 369 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…e court intended to overrule the countless Florida decisions which, applying the clear terms of the statute, have virtually as a matter of course awarded fees to omnibus and additional insureds such as Mrs. Arevalo.6 E. g., Main Ins. Co. v. Wiggins, 349 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Dawson v. Blue Cross Association, 293 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Chastain, 251 So. 2d 354 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971), cert. disch. 263 So. 2d 578 (Fla.1972); First National Ins. Co. of America v. Devine, 211 So.…
-
Carter v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. & Eual T. Berry, 377 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)…uage of the title is not binding as to the meaning and application of the act. Based on prior decisions of this court and those of our sister court as noted above, of which the Legislature is presumed to be aware, Main Insurance Company v. Wiggins, 349 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), Chapter 79-241, Laws of Florida (1979), is a substantive change in the law. We therefore, decline to give the statute retroactive [*CCCXXIV] application and find our prior decisions controlling as to this case. AFFIRMED. MILLS,…
-
COX v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 378 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)…ge which was available by virtue of being a relative residing in the same household but continued to exclude from consideration such coverage as might be available to a permissive user under the vehicle owner’s policy. Main Insurance Co. v. Wiggins, 349 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Recently two other district courts of appeal have rendered decisions contrary to the Taylor holding. Lezcano v. Leatherby Insurance Co., 372 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Curry, 371 So…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Roth v. OLD Republic Ins. Co. & N. River Ins. Co., 269 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1972)