ALICE M. MCCOLLOUGH,

v.

THOMAS MCCOLLOUGH

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. State of Fla. & Cnty. of Dade, 179 So. 2d 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
  …, it was said that if the issues were changed or new ones introduced or the grounds of relief materially varied, the matter could not he introduced in. an amendment. We referred to that part of this opinion in McCullough v. McCullough, 156 Fla. 321, 23 So. 2d 139, 140, and further •quoted from the opinion: “"We have •discovered no case which authorizes •such an amendment inconsistent with the allegations of the original bill.’ ” ’ We there drew attention to holdings of ■other courts that the liberality to be…
• Dimick v. RAY, 774 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
  …t would be “prejudiced” thereby. The cases have analyzed this prejudice element primarily in respect to the defendant’s ability to prepare for the new allegations prior to trial on the merits. For instance, in McCullough v. McCullough, 156 Fla. 321, 23 So. 2d 139 (1945), Frenz Enterprises, Inc. v. Port Everglades, 746 So. 2d 498 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), Designers Tile International Corp. v. Capitol C Corp., 499 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and Santi v. Zack Co., 287 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), all cited in th…
• Designers Tile Int'l Corp. v. Capitol C Corp., 499 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …e defendants R & S. Moreover, there was utterly no evidence presented to support the negligent hiring claim so that the defendants R & S were, as urged, entitled to a directed verdict below in their favor. See McCullough v. McCullough, 156 Fla. 821, 23 So. 2d 139, 140 (1945); Dean Co. v. U.S. Home Corp., 485 So. 2d 438, 439-40 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Tucker v. Daugherty, 122 So. 2d 230, 232 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 125 So. 2d 878 (Fla.1960); see also Swilley v. Economy Cab Co. of Jacksonville, 56 So. 2d 914…