RUSSELL E. HURD, APPELLANT,
v.
MARY F. HURD, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1977-09-02
No. EE-13
BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
349 So. 2d 782 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Without holding that appellee is forever entitled to continue receiving alimony from appellant, we do find and determine from the record in this case that the learned trial judge did not abuse his discretion when he failed to further reduce or eliminate alimony based upon a totality of the circumstances revealed by the evidence as of the date of the hearing which gave rise to the order here appealed.

Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees incident to this appeal is denied and the order here appealed is

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Maggieruth (Boram) Johnston v. Forrest Ray Boram, 386 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
    …father. There was competent substantial evidence before the trial judge to support the award of custody. Absent a clear abuse of discretion, the award of the trial judge should be affirmed. Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1975); Brock v. Brock, 349 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). The trial court failed to provide visitation rights for the mother. The noncustodial parent should be granted reasonable visitation with a child unless there is proof of extreme circumstances, or the trial court finds that the…
  • Nott v. Benita Kay Nott, 368 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
    …tain the length of time the rehabilitative alimony should continue. Secondly, appellant contends the wife should not have custody of the children. We find no merit in this contention. See: Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1975); Brock v. Brock, 349 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Lastly, appellant contends the award of $10,000.00 in attorney’s fees was excessive. In view of the fact that this matter will be returned to the trial court and that this opinion reverses as to permanent alimony, the trial jud…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw