LARRY PERKINS, APPELLANT,

v.

LA GORCE COUNTRY CLUB ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Newsome v. State, 355 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
  …erm of years, were entitled to ten peremptory challenges. We further held that restricting them to six constituted reversible error. We think Bell is controlling here and mandates reversal.1 The state contends that the reasoning of Harris v. State, 349 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), applies, rendering the error in the instant case harmless. We find Harris inapplicable. The holding in that case turned on the fact that Harris was convicted of only a lesser-included offense which, had he been initially charged…
• Benoit Verreautt v. State, 411 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …ut complaint, we do not reach the issue whether he was prejudiced by the ruling where he exercised the six peremptories given. Compare Meade v. State, 85 So. 2d 613 (Fla.1956); Newsome v. State, supra; and Bell v. State, supra, with Harris v. State, 349 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).…
• Santa FE Dev. Corp. v. Guitannie Randolph, 506 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …process where, as here, the party complaining evinces no dissatisfaction whatever at trial with the ultimate jury selected. Ter Keurst v. Miami Elevator Co., 486 So. 2d 547, 550 (Fla.1986); Young v. State, 234 So. 2d 341 (Fla.1970); Harris v. State, 349 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), cert. discharged, 362 So. 2d 1346 (Fla.1978). Moreover, we think Santa Fe’s trial counsel [*19] agreed, in any event, to the peremptory challenge procedure employed below, and his subsequent effort to renege on this agreement was…

Authorities Cited

• State of Fla. ex rel. William D. Barfield v. Fla. Yacht Club, 106 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958)
• State of Fla. ex rel. James P. Randall v. Miami Coin Club, Inc., 88 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1956)