STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

SALVATORE SGOBBO, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Webster v. Body Dynamics, Inc., 27 So. 3d 805 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …he defect alleged in the [plaintiff's] vehicle was the same as the defect involved in the recall, then evidence of the Jaguar recall campaign would be admitted for jury consideration." Id. at 649. Likewise, in Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Carpenter, 350 So. 2d 360, 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), the Second District held that while evidence of a subsequent government recall was not admissible to show that a defect existed in the plaintiff's particular motorcycle, it was admissible "to show that the defect existed in…
• Brantley v. Snapper Power Equipment, 665 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …1200, 20 Fla.L.Weekly D1460 (Fla. 4th DCA June 21, 1995). Indeed, Keller Industries presents an a fortiori situation because it involves a design rather than, as in this case, a manufacturing defect. See Harley-Davidson Motor Co., Inc. v. Carpenter, 350 So. 2d 360, 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), and cases cited; Millette v. Radosta, 84 Ill.App.3d 5, 39 III. Dec. 232, 404 N.E. 2d 823 (1980). We conclude that plaintiffs’ position on this issue is properly preserved for appellate review at least with respect to the lim…
• Alcan Aluminio DO Brasil, S.A. v. Lucrecia Hernandez, 554 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …, 444 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 453 So. 2d 44 (Fla.1984); Cassisi v. Maytag Company, 396 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Clark v. Boeing Company, 395 So. 2d 1226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Harley-Davidson Motor Company, Inc. v. Carpenter, 350 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).…