C. E. HARRELL

v.

THE DESOTO NATIONAL BANK OF ARCADIA, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION

Fla. | 1945-07-24

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur., BROWN and SEBRING, JJ., dissent.

156 Fla. 387 Florida Supreme Court (1945) Positive Treatment

Also reported at: 23 So. 2d 382

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

BROWN and SEBRING, JJ., dissent.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Cott v. De Lancy George Cott, 98 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957)

…question of whether or not in the governing statute, section 65.04(2), Florida Statutes, 1955, F.S.A., the term “naturally impotent” contemplates or has the same connotation as congenitally impotent. The case of Gibbs v. Gibbs, 1945, 156 Fla. 404, 23 So. 2d 382, involved a suit for divorce in which one of the grounds was natural impotence. This ground was not sustained. The court stated: “The first question urged turns on a judicial determination of the words ‘naturally impotent,’ being one of the grounds…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw