JOHN F. ADERHOLD, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
BLAIR CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
JOHN F. ADERHOLD, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
BLAIR CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
350 So. 2d 550
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
[*551] PER CURIAM.
The record supports the trial court’s determination that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that appellant, when injured on the job, was an employee of the contractor who was engaged to perform the owner’s work. The subcontractor whose negligence allegedly caused appellant’s injury was immune from liability, as the trial court held in granting the motion for summary judgment. Sections 440.-10, .11, Florida Statutes (1971).
AFFIRMED.
McCORD, C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. Comet Steel Erection, Inc., 435 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…kavitz v. L.C. Boggs Industries, Inc., 407 So. 2d 910 (Fla.1981); Younger v. Giller Contracting Co., 143 Fla. 335, 196 So. 690 (1940); Williams v. Corbett Cranes, Inc., 396 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Aderhold v. Blair Contracting Company, Inc., 350 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Mack v. Cook & Pruitt Masonry, Inc., 186 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966). Affirmed. . Appellant concedes that the subcontractor is an employee of the general contractor so as to render applicable the fellow servant rule of Secti…