PAUL SAMUEL PETERSON, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Antone v. State, 382 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 1980)
  …. Florida courts have also been called upon to apply the Aguilar-Spinelli test. See, e. g., Findlay v. State, 316 So. 2d 33 (Fla.1975); State v. Smith, 233 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1970); St. John v. State, 356 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Davis v. State, 350 So. 2d 834 (Fla.2d DCA 1977), cert. denied, 355 So. 2d 517 (Fla.1978). . Wilson and Henry are distinguishable from our decision in Greene v. State, 351 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 1977). In Greene we did not address the applicability of McDole, but, instead, we discusse…
• MacHado v. State, 363 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …’s presence and maintained control over it. This proof may consist either of evidence establishing actual knowledge by appellant, or evidence of incriminating circumstances from which the trier of fact might lawfully infer knowledge. Davis v. State, 350 So. 2d 834 (Fla.2d DCA 1977); Frank v. State, 199 So. 2d 117 (Fla.1st DCA 1967). The record reveals that the items, clearly identifiable as lottery paraphernalia, were found in many accessible locations in appellants’ residence. These items were recovered fro…
• ST. John v. State, 356 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …ntraband must have been in plain view, State v. Ashby, 245 So. 2d 225 (Fla.1971), or the informant’s tip must have been legally sufficient to give the police officer probable cause to believe that the automobile contained contraband, Davis v. State, 350 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). It is not a search for an officer to observe contraband in plain view, or as here, to detect the odor of marijuana from a place where he has a right to be. State v. Ashby, supra; McGowan v. State, 351 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 4th DCA 19…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• James v. State, 334 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)