STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. JERRY SOLANO LEWIS, RELATOR,
v.
JACK SANDSTROM, DIRECTOR, DADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Lewis filed a habeas corpus petition challenging a resentencing that eliminated his jail time credit, arguing credit for time served is mandatory under Florida law. The court dismissed the petition as moot, finding the trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify the original lawful sentence.
The court held that the resentencing order is a nullity because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to change petitioner's prior lawful sentence in any way. Therefore, the original sentence entered on August 12, 1976, remains in full force and effect, making the mootness question academic.
[1] A court lacks jurisdiction to modify a lawful sentence after it has been imposed and the defendant has begun serving it.
[2] A sentence imposed by a court lacking jurisdiction is a nullity.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The petition, response and exhibits attached thereto show that both the order vacating the original sentence and new sentence entered on January 28, 1977, are a nullity, in that the court lacked jurisdiction to change petitioner's prior lawful sentence in any way.”
Establishes the core holding that the trial court lacked authority to vacate and modify the original sentence.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLewis was sentenced on August 12, 1976, to five concurrent five-year sentences with 235 days credit for jail time served. On January 28, 1977, after a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Mitigate Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This matter is before this court on a petition for writ of habeas corpus, wherein, the petitioner stated in essence, that he is presently in respondent’s custody in the Dade County Jail; that on August 12,1976, he appeared before the Circuit Court of Dade County for sentencing in case Nos. 75-544, 75-8267, and 76-6503B; that on the same date, the court sentenced petitioner to five years in the State Penitentiary at Lake Butler in each of the above cases, sentences to run concurrently with credit for time served in the Dade County Jail amounting to two hundred, thirty-five days; that the court further provided that after serving two and one-half years, the petitioner was to be released to the custody of the Probation and Parole Commission for the remaining two and one-half years. The petition also stated that on September 9, 1976, petitioner, through the office of the Public Defender, filed a motion to mitigate the sentences; that petitioner was returned to the Dade County Jail from the state penitentiary and appeared before the sentencing court on October 5, 1976, which after conducting a hearing, denied the motion; that petitioner then wrote a letter to the court requesting that he be allowed to stay in the Dade County Jail, rather than the Lake Butler facilities, in that he was receiving medical treatment in Dade County and, in addition, feared for his life at the state prison; that on January 28,1977, petitioner and public defender again appeared before the circuit court and ore tenus reviewed his motion to mitigate the sentence.
In addition, the petition further stated that at the time of this second hearing to mitigate, petitioner agreed to do anything if he would be allowed to stay in the Dade County Jail and in response, the court explained to him that the only way this could be accomplished was if petitioner would waive his credit for time served, which at the time amounted to four hundred and four days; that petitioner agreed and the sentence imposed on August 12, 1976, was thereupon vacated; that petitioner was thereupon resentenced to three and one-half years, one year in the Dade County Jail and two and one-half years probation, concurrent, no credit for time served.
Finally, the petition states that on May 5, 1977, petitioner, through counsel, filed a motion to correct the sentence imposed on January 28,1977, pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, requesting that the portion of the sentence denying credit for time served be vacated; and that subsequent to a hearing held on the matter before the sentencing judge, the motion to correct sentence was denied and petitioner was remanded to the Dade County Jail.
Petitioner thereupon requested that we issue our most gracious writ of habeas corpus based upon the contention that, pursuant to Section 921.161, Florida Statutes (1975), credit for time served is mandatory and cannot be waived. The above contention is, however moot, for the following reason.
The petition, response and exhibits attached thereto show that both the order vacating the original sentence and new sentence entered on January 28, 1977, are a nullity, in that the court lacked jurisdiction to change petitioner’s prior lawful sentence in any way. State v. Evans, 225 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 229 So. 2d 261 (Fla.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1053, 90 S.Ct. 1393, 25 L.Ed.2d 668 (1970).
Therefore, the original sentence entered on August 12, 1976, remains in full force and effect and the petition is hereby dismissed.
Petition dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Evans, 225 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
- Evans v. State, 229 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 1969)
- Ponce v. California, 397 U.S. 1053 (U.S. 1970)
- Primous v. United States, 397 U.S. 1053 (U.S. 1970)