A. J. TURNER AND JOHNNIE M. TURNER, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE TRADE STYLE OF BERT TIRE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
POWER BRAKE & EQUIPMENT COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND L. R. HOLTON, AS SHERIFF OF DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEES
A. J. TURNER AND JOHNNIE M. TURNER, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE TRADE STYLE OF BERT TIRE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
POWER BRAKE & EQUIPMENT COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND L. R. HOLTON, AS SHERIFF OF DESOTO COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEES
85 So. 2d 232
Florida Supreme Court (1956)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on authority of Greenfield Villages, Inc., v. Thompson, Fla., 44 So. 2d 679, it appearing that the appellant has an adequate remedy at law. As explained in Fair v. Tampa Electric Co., 158 Fla. 15, 27 So. 2d 514, and Kellerman v. Commercial Credit Co., 138 Fla. 133, 189 So. 689, there is no time limit imposed on the motion for stay of execution provided for in Section 55.38, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. Compare Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Lake County Citrus Sales, Inc., Fla., 48 So. 2d 922.
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, THORN-AL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hickey v. Reeves F. Wells, 91 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1956)…n with the acts — is sufficiently described in a prima facie manner by linking the illegal acts to his office at specified times on specified persons. Similar vague charges were involved in State of Florida, ex rel. Florida Bar v. Grant, Fla. 1956, 85 So. 2d 232, 233, where a lawyer was being tried for unprofessional conduct. We quote from that opinion by Mr. Associate Justice Stanly: “Briefly stated, subparagraph (a) is a general charge which says in substance that respondent specialized in handling divor…
-
Petition of Dade Cnty. Bar Ass'n President's & State Attorney's Special Comm., 116 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1959)…ng that the integration rule provision for grievance committees superseded the former order. . Article XI, subd. 5(b) Integration Rule of the Florida Bar, Volume 3, Florida Statutes 1957, p. 3208, F.S.A. . State ex rel. Florida Bar v. Grant, Fla., 85 So. 2d 232; In re Integration Rule of the Florida Bar, Fla., 103 So. 2d 873; Sheiner v. State, 82 So. 2d 657, 667; State v. Sheiner, Fla., 112 So. 2d 571; State ex rel. Arnold v. Revels, Fla., 100 So. 2d 51. Cf. Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm…
-
THE Florida BAR v. Welch, 309 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1975)…ment, we find this argument to be groundless in view of- our previous admonitions to respondent. As to the alleged unfairness of the Bar proceedings, we have previously considered and rejected this argument in State ex rel. The Florida Bar v. Grant, 85 So. 2d 232 (Fla.1956). Finally, concerning respondent’s third contention, it is sufficient to note that the allegedly “compelled” testimony pertained solely to Count Two, which was ultimately dismissed. After considering the nature of the present offense in l…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Fair v. Tampa Elec. Co., 158 Fla. 15 (Fla. 1946)
- Greenfield Villages v. Thompson, 44 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 1950)
- Kellerman v. Commercial Credit Co., 138 Fla. 133 (Fla. 1939)