MARILYN ZINT DONAHUE, APPELLANT,
v.
JEAN STRATTON, ALIAS JEAN ZINT, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment, finding that the substantial questions presented on appeal had already been decided against the appellant in a prior case. The court granted the appellee's motion to affirm without further argument.
Yes, the substantial questions presented on appeal were answered adversely to the appellant's contention in the case of Hill v. Morris, Fla., 85 So. 2d 847, and therefore the motion to affirm is granted.
“it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that the only substantial questions presented on this appeal were answered adversely to appellant's contention in the case of Hill v. Morris, Fla., 85 So. 2d 847”
This quote explains the primary reason for the court's decision to affirm the judgment.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellant appealed a judgment, and the appellee filed a motion to affirm the judgment. The Supreme Court reviewed the record to determine the subs…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Affirm cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of the appellee to affirm the judg ment appealed from pursuant to 30 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that the only substantial questions presented on this appeal were answered adversely to appellant’s contention in the case of Hill v. Morris, Fla., 85 So. 2d 847, and it, therefore, appearing to the court that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby granted and the judgment is
Affirmed.
DREW, €. J., and HOBSON and THORNAL, JJ., and PRUNTY, Associate Justice, concur.