DAOUD

v.

MATZ

Citator

Cited By

• Barnett v. EMR Telemetry & Travelers Ins. Co., 396 So. 2d 791 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
  …hable from those in Williams. A distinction, has been drawn between “examination” and “treatment”; however, such distinction should not be artificially and unrealistically made. Daniel1 v. Florida Pulp & Paper Go., 1 F.C.R. 161 (1955), cert, denied 85 So. 2d 758 (1955). To distinguish a “mere” examination from treatment, it is essential to examine not only the actual functions performed by the physician, but also the purpose of the physician’s examination. Suddath Van Lines v. Williams, supra; The Great Atl…