NELSON ROY MULLIGAN A/K/A JOHN NELSON MULLIGAN, APPELLANT,
v.
BEVERLY MULLIGAN A/K/A BEVERLY EVANS, APPELLEE
NELSON ROY MULLIGAN A/K/A JOHN NELSON MULLIGAN, APPELLANT,
BEVERLY MULLIGAN A/K/A BEVERLY EVANS, APPELLEE
351 So. 2d 361
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant is challenging a judgment in favor of his former wife, the appellee, for amounts due for past support, alimony, educational expenses, and medical expenses. The judgment was for $85,-000.00, and the appellant has failed to demonstrate a lack of evidence in the record to support the award. The appellant also claims error by the trial court in failing to set out in the judgment the amounts due for each category claimed by the appellee. We agree that it would be helpful to this court in reviewing the matter if this had been done, but there is no legal requirement that the trial court make such specific findings. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Isaacs v. State, 373 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1979)…rt of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 351 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). We issued the writ and have- heard argument of the parties. The case was initially consolidated with Pace v. State, 350 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Sanders v. State, 351 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Keller v. State, 351 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); and Hampton v. State, 351 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA [*912] 1977). In part the issue is identical to the certified question answered by this court in Grubbs v. State, 373 So. 2…
-
Crippen v. State, 573 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…ances surrounding the arrest of the appellant. The trial court did err in sentencing the appellant to eighteen months probation on counts II and III, because these counts were misdemeanors, punishable by up to one year in prison. Sanders v. State, 351 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction and reverse the sentence as to counts II and III. The trial court is instructed to resentence the appellant on those counts in accord with our opinion in Sanders. DOWNEY, GUNTH…