THOMAS BREAMFIELD, RELATOR,
v.
THE HON. D. C. SMITH, CIRCUIT JUDGE, NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
THOMAS BREAMFIELD, RELATOR,
THE HON. D. C. SMITH, CIRCUIT JUDGE, NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
351 So. 2d 368
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1977)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Subsequent to the receipt of the response of the respondent herein this court received a certified copy of an Order of the Circuit Court in St. Lucie County Case No. 2851, State of Florida v. Thomas Breamfield, in which the court ruled upon petitioner’s motion for post conviction relief, filed pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. The entry of said Order is the relief which the petitioner sought by virtue of this petition for writ of mandamus, thus rendering this proceeding moot.
Accordingly, the petition for peremptory writ of mandamus is DENIED.
DOWNEY, LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Twenty-Four Collection, Inc. v. M. Weinbaum Constr., Inc., 427 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)…m and creates in it an immediate cause of action for breach of contract. Hospital Mortg. Group v. First Prudential Dev., 411 So. 2d 181, 182 (Fla.1982); see also Mori v. Matsushita Elec. Corp., 380 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Ferslew v. Relaford, 351 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Weinbaum’s demand that the penalty clause (which provided that the contract be completed by a certain date and, if not completed, that [*1112] after such date a substantial daily penalty would be owed by Weinbaum) be eliminated,…
-
Atl. BAY, Inc. v. Tropical Rests., Inc., 463 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Helman v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, 349 So. 2d 1187 (Fla.1977); Ferslew v. Relaford, 351 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Keith v. Amrep Corporation, 312 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Donnelly v. Marriott Corporation, 266 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).…
-
AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Monsanto Co., 487 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…the authorities relied on by appellants do not support that instruction upon the evidence in this case. Rutig v. Lake Jem Land Company, 155 Fla. 420, 20 So. 2d 497 (1945); Livingston v. Malever, 103 Fla. 200, 137 So. 113 (1931); Ferslew v. Relaford, 351 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Rylander v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 302 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Pan American Distributing Company v. Sav-a-Stop, Inc., 124 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). Even assuming proper waiver instructions would have been in order, w…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence