CLIFTON KELLY MASSEY, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 1977-10-28
No. HH-242
SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur.
351 So. 2d 376 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases

Opinion of the Court
MELVIN, Judge.

MELVIN, Judge.

By Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, petitioner-defendant challenges the validity of a ten-year sentence “at hard labor” imposed upon him August 13, 1970, in the Circuit Court of Bradford County, Florida, for the offense of forgery and uttering a forgery (Case No. 2270). He urges that the offense is a third degree felony and that the maximum penalty is five years. Likewise, on August 13,1970, in the same court, in Case Numbers 2271 and 2272, he received concurrent five-year sentences for the offenses of forgery and uttering a forgery, each to be served “at hard labor”. We treat the petition as one to amend said sentences.

' When the petitioner was before the court for judgment and sentence, Section 831.01, Florida Statutes (1969) was applicable and provided a maximum sentence of ten years for such offense.

The provision “at hard labor”, appearing in said sentences, is merely surplusage and the same is hereby stricken as such. McDonald v. State, 321 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), and Ussery v. State, 350 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). As amended, the sentences referred to are

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sims v. State, 364 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
    …t’s probation. The order of revocation of probation is accordingly affirmed. However, the provision in appellant’s sentence that he be confined “at hard labor” is not authorized by law, is surplus-age and as such is hereby stricken. Massey v. State, 351 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). As amended, the sentence is affirmed. BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and BOOTH, JJ., concur.…
  • Manning v. State, 365 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
    …ER CURIAM. Appellant’s conviction for manslaughter is affirmed. However, the provision in her sentence that she be imprisoned “at hard labor” is not authorized by law, and being merely surplusage, this provision is hereby stricken. Massey v. State, 351 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). As amended, the sentence is affirmed. McCORD, C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.…
  • Alexander v. State, 404 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)
    …PER CURIAM. The provision in appellant’s sentence that he be confined “at hard labor” is not authorized by law, is surplusage, and as such is hereby stricken. Massey v. State, 351 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). As amended, the sentence is affirmed. The appeal from the conviction for grand theft is dismissed without prejudice to appellant to file a motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. See Wilson v. State, 378 S…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw