VICTOR R. KNOBLOCK, APPELLANT,
v.
PAREE W. KNOBLOCK, APPELLEE
VICTOR R. KNOBLOCK, APPELLANT,
PAREE W. KNOBLOCK, APPELLEE
351 So. 2d 387
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1977)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 49 cases
Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.
Substantial competent evidence supports the trial court’s award to appellee wife of special equities in certain property held in the husband’s name alone, those properties having been acquired with funds withdrawn from a joint bank account to which both husband and wife substantially contributed. See Razzano v. Razzano, 307 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (25 total)
-
Vermon T. Donald v. State, 562 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…6 So. 2d 82 (Fla.1983); Troupe v. Rowe, 283 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1973); Daniels v. State, 513 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Padgett v. State, 497 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Andrews v. State, 357 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); and Flowers v. State, 351 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); see also, Annot., 28 ALR4 147 (1984); Annot., 26 ALR4 905 (1983). The primary issue raised by appellant is whether a sentence for a felony of the first degree under the habitual violent felony offender statute must be for life,…
-
State ex rel. William M. C. Wilhoit v. Wells, 356 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)…ncements upon a plea have legal significance in themselves. Reyes, 224 So. 2d at 305, Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.172(f). See also ABA Standards, The Function of the Trial Judge § 4.2 (1972) (Acceptance of pleas of guilty or nolo contendere); Flowers v. State, 351 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Here it is evident that on October 17, 1977, the trial court rejected Wilhoit’s previously accepted nolo contendere pleas because the complaining witnesses changed their minds or found they misunderstood the consequences of the…
-
Farber v. State, 409 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)…aid, impose no such limitation. Second, to the extent that Williams gratuitously indicates that a sentence is not final [*74] until the “completion and filing of the form of judgment and sentence,” it is expressly inconsistent with Flowers v. State, 351 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), see also Toombs v. State, 404 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Ward v. United States, 508 F. 2d 664 (5th Cir. 1975), and inconsistent with every other case cited herein holding, at least implicitly, that the oral pronouncement of…
Previewing 3 of 25 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Razzano v. Razzano, 307 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)