STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
ALEXANDER RONALD PARSONS, RESPONDENT
STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
ALEXANDER RONALD PARSONS, RESPONDENT
351 So. 2d 723
Florida Supreme Court (1977)
Caution
Cited by 30 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Based upon a conflict between the decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, in the above-styled ease (334 So. 2d 308) and Hornblower v. State, 331 So. 2d 339 (Fla.1st DCA 1976), we issued a writ of certiorari in this cause. In view of our decision filed today in Hornblower v. State, 351 So. 2d 716 (Fla.1977), we approve the decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, in this cause and discharge the writ of certiorari.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND and SUNDBERG, JJ., concur. OVERTON, C. J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
State v. Tsavaris, 394 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 1981)…d because they were in violation of chapter 934. This Court affirmed the trial court suppression order and expressly held that the recordings were unlawful interceptions. The Court reached a similar conclusion in Shevin v. Sunbeam Television Corp., 351 So. 2d 723 (Fla.1977), appeal dismissed, 435 U.S. 920, 98 S.Ct. 1480, 55 L.Ed.2d 513 (1978). In that case various newspapers mounted a wholesale attack upon the constitutionality of section 934.03(2)(d), Florida Statutes (1979), which requires that all parties…1 / 2
-
State v. Inciarrano, 473 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1985)…oes there, and chapter 934 does not apply. It is a different question, however, when the individual whose conversation is being recorded is in his own home or office. In my view, our construction of chapter 934 in Shevin v. Sunbeam Television Corp., 351 So. 2d 723 (Fla.1977), upholding the constitutionality of the statute with regard to its prohibition of secret electronic recordings by investigative reporters, applies to the latter situation but not to the circumstances of this case. The decisions of this Co…
-
Byron v. State of Fla. ex rel. Robert W. Schellenberg & Robert L. Shevin, 360 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)…udgment and approved Judge Rawls’ reasoning based on “constitutional guaranties of the right to privacy”26 arising from Article I,, Section 12, of the Florida Constitution. The Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Shevin v. Sunbeam Television Corp., 351 So. 2d 723 (Fla.1977), was concerned with a statutory, not a constitutional, claim of privacy. Yet that decision similarly traces the right of disclosural privacy to its source in the essential integrity of personhood. The Court upheld, against a First Amendme…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hornblower v. State, 351 So. 2d 716 (Fla. 1977)
- Parsons v. State, 334 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
- Hornblower v. State, 331 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)