JACALYN BROWN, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
JACALYN BROWN, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
351 So. 2d 1101
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Sena v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 305 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Bragg, 371 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)…lineup took place prior to the appellee’s appearance before any judicial officer and prior to the filing of a formal charging document. Under such circumstances we do not believe the appellee had a right to counsel at the lineup. Robinson v. State, 351 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); State v. Ciongoli, 313 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). Accordingly, the order of suppression is reversed. ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., and SCHOONOVER, JACK R., Associate Judge, concur.…
-
Isaacs v. State, 373 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 1979)…rd argument of the parties. The case was initially consolidated with Pace v. State, 350 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Sanders v. State, 351 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); Keller v. State, 351 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); and Hampton v. State, 351 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA [*912] 1977). In part the issue is identical to the certified question answered by this court in Grubbs v. State, 373 So. 2d 905 (Fla.1979). For the reasons expressed in our opinion in Grubbs, the decision of the district court is quas…
Authorities Cited
- Sena v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 305 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)