AB ROSEN, APPELLANT,

v.

SELMA BAUMAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND CITY OF OAKLAND PARK, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• B.G. Wasden v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 474 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
  …or her concept of how the trial is going. As such the failure to object constitutes intentional trial tactics, mistakes of which are not to be corrected on appeal simply because they backfire, save in the most rare of circumstances, Haist v. Scarp, 351 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). But see Akin v. State, 86 Fla. 564, 98 So. 609, 612 (1923). Finding the grant of a mistrial and a new trial was error, we reverse and remand this case to the trial court for reinstatement of the final judgment upon the jury ver…
• Maynard Nelson and Myrtle Nelson v. Reliance Ins. Co., 368 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
  …or her concept of how the trial is going. As such the failure to object constitutes intentional trial tactics, mistakes of which are not to be corrected on appeal simply because they backfire, save in the most rare of circumstances, Haist v. Scarp, 351 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). But see Akin v. State, 86 Fla. 564, 98 So. 609, 612 (1923). AFFIRMED. DOWNEY, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.…
• Norman v. Gloria Farms, Inc., 668 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)
  …or her concept of how the trial is going. As such the failure to object constitutes intentional trial tactics, mistakes of which are not to be corrected on appeal simply because they backfire, save in the most rare of circumstances, Haist v. Scarp, 351 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 4th DCA1977). But see Akin v. State, 86 Fla. 564, 98 So. 609, 612 (1923).” 368 So. 2d at 362. There is but one way to describe the holdings in LeRetilley and Nelson. They manifestly stand for the proposition that an argument urging a civil j…