IN THE INTEREST OF G. L. T., JR., A CHILD. GEORGE L. THOMAS, JR., APPELLANT.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1977-06-17
Nos. 76-930, 76-1492
DOWNEY and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur., DAUKSCH, J., dissents, with opinion.
352 So. 2d 79 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the authority of In the Interest of R. P. C., 352 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 4th DCA, opinion filed June 3, 1977).

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., dissents, with opinion.

Dissent
DAUKSCH, Judge,

DAUKSCH, Judge,

dissenting:

I must respectfully dissent. The Appellant was a juvenile taken into custody on February 24, 1976. The person who took him into custody was required to file an intake report within three days after the taking into custody occurred. Section 39.-03(2), Florida Statutes (1975). The intake report was not filed until March 3, 1976, therefore the child should have been discharged. In the Interest of J. W. H., et al., etc. v. State of Florida, 345 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 1st DCA, opinion filed May 18, 1977).

I am aware of the opinion from our court referred to in the majority opinion here, to which I would have dissented if I were a member of that panel. The legislature used the word shall and as was said in J. W. H., supra, we should interpret words the way they are written and not the way they should have been written. In this case sub-judiee the lack of prejudice to the Appellant is quite obvious on its face and the detriment tó society should my position here prevail could possibly be great. However, the legislature must be taken at its word.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • In the Interest of G. L. T., JR. v. State, 366 So. 2d 25 (Fla. 1978)
    …ed prejudice. Accordingly, the decisions of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, are approved. It is so ordered. ENGLAND, C. J., and OVERTON and HATCHETT, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents. . In the Interest of G. L. T., Jr. v. State, 352 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); In the Interest of R. P. C. v. State, 352 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). . It should be noted that § 39.03, Fla.Stat. (1975), was substantially revised by Ch. 78-414, § 5, Laws of Fla. . It should be made clear that we do not…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw