DUVAL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, APPELLANT,
v.
DOUGLASS RYAN COOKE, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1977-11-17
No. HH-74
BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
352 So. 2d 126 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We treat the Duval County School Board’s appeal, styled interlocutory appeal, as petition for writ of certiorari. No grounds having been asserted by the Board for issuance of the writ, the petition for writ of certiorari is

DENIED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lyman Walker, III v. State, 366 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
    …the department shall prepare and send to each licensee and permittee a notice of fees due for all licenses and permits of said licensee or per-mittee which were issued prior to December 1 . . .” . See, Walker v. State, Department of Transportation, 352 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) upholding the DOT’s denial of the “farm produce exemption” of Florida Statute § 479.16(2) for Walker’s signs. . 23 U.S.C. § 131. . 23 U.S.C. § 131(g), (n); Fla.Stat. § 479.24(1); Brazil v. DOA, 347 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977…
  • Henderson Sign Serv. v. Dep't OF Transp., 390 So. 2d 159 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
    …170 So. 2d 817 (Fla.1964); Welker v. State, 93 So. 2d 591 (Fla.1957). Moreover, the burden of proving entitlement to any exceptions of the chapter’s advertising requirements is upon appellants, not the Department. Walker v. State, Dept. of Transp., 352 So. 2d 126, 127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Appellants’ primary contention is that since the Department failed to establish the date of the erection of the signs,3 or the date when the Department designated the highway as part of the national system of interstate an…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw