JAMES MCCLOUD, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1977-11-29
No. 76-1291
Before HAVERFIELD, NATHAN and KEHOE, JJ.
352 So. 2d 546 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1977) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cacciatore v. State, 186 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Rhome v. State, 222 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Boykin v. State, 309 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ronny A. Zamora v. State, 361 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
    …n deprived Zamora of the “unfettered testimony of a crucial witness to his insanity defense” and thus deprived him of a fair and impartial trial. The purpose of the sequestration rule is to avoid the coloring of a witness’s testimony. Ali v. State, 352 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Sub judice, nothing in the tape recordings heard and discussed by the witnesses related to anything testified to in court. The taped conversations primarily concerned the location of the murder weapon, a fact not established befo…
  • DEL Monte Banana Co. & Fed. Transp., Inc. v. Chacon, 466 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
    …rt, denied, 372 U.S. 904, 83 S.Ct. 742, 9 L.Ed.2d 730 (1963). Accord Odom v. State, 403 So. 2d 936 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 925, 102 S.Ct. 1970, 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982); Dardashti v. Singer, 407 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Ali v. State, 352 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Captain Ramirez, the captain of the ship on which the plaintiff was allegedly injured, was one of the defendants’ key witnesses. He testified for the defense that the alleged accident never occurred. At apparently more than one p…
  • Thompson v. State, 374 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
    …upon Thompson’s ability to prepare for trial. Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla.1971). The trial judge could then have properly and fairly exercised his discretion and entered such order as was just under the circumstances. See Ali v. State, 352 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Such a determination should have been made prior to admission into evidence of the testimony, but certainly no later than submission of the case to the jury. We cannot remand for a posttrial hearing because a determination at tha…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw