WASH FOOTMAN

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. | 1945-11-02

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

156 Fla. 535 Florida Supreme Court (1945) Positive Treatment

Also reported at: 23 So. 2d 838

Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The record and the briefs in this case have been carefully examined and we find no reversible error.

Affirmed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Smith v. City OF Gainesville, 93 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 1957)

…king the license of the offender, the municipal judge merely follows the mandate of the statute as the administrative representative of the State Department of Public Safety at the municipal level. He has no discretion to exercise. Bartels v. State, 156 Fla. 535, 24 So. 2d 40. He is in no sense a State officer. The statute merely imposes this additional duty upon him as an administrative detail supplementary to his judicial functions as a city judge. We find no constitutional objection to the statutory impo…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw