IRAN J. GONZALEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
IRAN J. GONZALEZ, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
352 So. 2d 944
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However we agree with appellant that there are imperfections in his sentence. The present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975), requires. Brooks v. State, 349 So. 2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra. We remand the case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.
GRIMES, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Miami Beach v. Jacquelyn Renee Town, 375 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…zed and enforced a strong public policy in favor [*867] of the confidentiality of such information.3 See Lee v. Beach Publishing Co., 127 Fla. 600, 173 So. 440 (1937); Rose v. D’Alessandro, 364 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); City of Tampa v. Harold, 352 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Getter v. Yanks, 290 So. 2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Widener v. Croft, 184 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966), cert. denied, 192 So. 2d 486 (Fla.1966). In the absence of a clear showing of necessity, which the respondent did not make…
Authorities Cited
- Brooks v. State, 349 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)