ROBERT SCHWARTZMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
MERRITT ISLAND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT, DONALD GILROY AND CARL SCHNEIDER, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1977-11-29
No. 77-455
ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY, J., concur.
352 So. 2d 1230 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1977) Caution
Cited by 7 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida District Court of Appeal reversed a declaratory judgment and held that a nonprofit volunteer fire department is an "agency" subject to Florida's Public Records Act, despite its volunteer nature and charitable activities. The court concluded that the totality of circumstances—including public funding, county equipment, and operation on county property—brings the organization within the scope of public records law.


Holding

The court held that the Merritt Island Volunteer Fire Department is an "agency" acting on behalf of a public agency within the meaning of § 119.011(2) and its records are "public records" under § 119.011(1). The totality of circumstances—including public funding, county equipment provision, operation on county property, and the department's essential public function—establishes its public agency nature, though the opinion is limited to this organization and its specific facts.


Headnotes

[1] A nonprofit volunteer fire department acting on behalf of a public agency is subject to the Florida Public Records Act.

[2] The totality of factors, including public funding, use of public property, and performance of essential public functions, can establish the public agency nature of an org…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“[QUOTE REDACTED — failed verbatim audit (paraphrase, not verbatim). See original_text for the text as originally displayed.]”

Establishes the statutory basis for concluding the volunteer fire department qualifies as an agency under the Public Records Act.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Merritt Island Volunteer Fire Department is a nonprofit corporation of volunteers who operate county-owned firefighting equipment and also engage …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Judge.

LETTS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment holding that a nonprofit volunteer fire department is not an “agency” and its records are not “public records” within the purview of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (1975).

We reverse.

The Merritt Island Volunteer Fire Department is a nonprofit corporation composed of public spirited citizens who volunteer, with virtually no recompense, to man the county owned fire fighting equipment on Merritt Island. In addition to performing this most valuable and essential function, thereby saving the county and taxpayers vast sums of money, these citizens also sell Christmas trees, hold chicken frys and cater banquets, donating much of the net income per annum generated therefrom to a large number of charitable projects. Included in such projects we find seven or eight leagues and associations such as lassie leagues, midget football, crippled children-and a host of others.

The appellant is an investigative reporter for the Today newspaper who wishes to engage in a fishing expedition into all of the volunteer fire department’s records because he claims that the department is subject to the Florida Public Records Act, § 119 Florida Statutes (1975), and we are compelled to agree.

Any fire department cannot help but be classified as an agency under the following definition in § 119.011(2):

(2) “Agency” shall mean any state, county, district, authority, or municipal officer, department, division, board, bureau, commission, or other separate unit of government created or established by law and any other public or private agency, person, partnership, corporation, or business entity acting on behalf of any public agency.

Likewise, “public records” in § 119.011(1) include all the following:

(1) “Public records” means all documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings or other material, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received, pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business by any agency.

The volunteer department argues that its membership files, minutes of its meetings and its charitable activities, for example, are not “official business” and that it is not an “agency” under the Act insofar as those matters are concerned. It also points out that other civic organizations use the fire station premises owned by the county for similar fund raising activities and functions.

We are most sympathetic to these arguments, but we cannot ignore the language of the enacted statute and have no doubt that this volunteer fire department is at the very least “acting on behalf of (a) public agency.”1 Inevitably, the present Act covers an organization entrusted with the sole stewardship over firefighting and funded in part by public moneys. The whys and wherefores of how membership is obtained with a view to firefighting expertise, the fact that the county pays $850.00 per month toward its support and supplies all the equipment, the placing of county funds in a common bank account along with the fish fry money, and the conduct of all its activities on county owned property (even if the department did raise $65,000 to help construct the building) all establish the public agency nature of the organization.

Perhaps not any one of the above factors set forth in the preceding paragraph would bring the volunteer department within the purview of the public records law, but the totality of them leads irresistibly to the conclusion that this department is subject to the Public Records Act.

Lest we be misunderstood, or misquoted, we would comment that this opinion is limited to the organization and the facts of this case and should not be interpreted to subject all civic and charitable organizations to the Public Records Act.

Reversed with instructions to permit the inspection and copying2 of all “public records” of the Merritt Island Volunteer Fire Department.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY, J., concur. . The quoted statute was amended in 1975 after the holding in State ex rel. Tindel v. Sharp, 300 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).

. The officials of the volunteer department had offered to permit inspection but not copying. Section 119.07(1) Florida Statutes specifically requires that the custodian of the records “shall furnish copies.”


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • News & Sun-Sentinel Co. v. Schwab, 596 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1992)
    …ealth Corp., Inc., 582 So. 2d 730 (Fla.2d DCA 1991); Fox v. News-Press Publishing Co., Inc., 545 So. 2d 941 (Fla.2d DCA 1989); Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 429 So. 2d 343, (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Schwartzman v. Merritt Island, 352 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), cert. denied, 358 So. 2d 132 (Fla.1978). However, rather than relying on any one of these factors, the courts generally have made the determination based on the “totality of factors.” See Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 582 So. 2d at 7…
  • News-Journal Corp. v. Mem'l Hospital-West Volusia, Inc., 695 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
    …obligation to build and operate school facilities. Thus, the meetings of the architectural firm remained private and its records were not subject to public inspection. The contrasting case is Schwartzman v. Merritt Island Volunteer Fire Department, 352 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). There, the volunteers were providing fire protection in place of the county. The county provided the facility and equipment and contributed a portion of the funds for the operation. And had the volunteers not stepped forward, th…
  • FOX v. News-Press Publ'g Co., Inc., 545 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
    …indicate a significant level of involvement by the public entity, such as the City in this instance, can lead to the conclusion that the records are subject to the Public Records Act (the Act). See Schwartzman v. Merritt Island Volunteer Fire Dep’t, 352 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977), cert. denied, 358 So. 2d 132 (1978). Under the towing agreement before us, the City required Alligator Towing as its towing agent to, among other things: (a) remove vehicles from the streets and other property of the City only…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw