SHARON PACKING COMPANY, A CORPORATION, AND HOLLYWOOD PACKING CO., INC., A CORPORATION T/A WESTLAND MEATS, PETITIONERS,

v.

HOBART CORPORATION, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Zennon Mierzwa v. Fla. Windstorm Underwriting Ass'n, 877 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
  …e policy. § 627.702(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). The VPL is part of every real property casualty insurance policy written on property in Florida.’ Citizens Ins. Co. v. Barnes, 98 Fla. 938, 124 So. 722 (1929); Regency Baptist Temple v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 352 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). The meaning of the VPL is simple and straightforward. There are two essentials in the statute. The first is that the building be “insured by [an] insurer as to a [e.s.] covered peril.” § 627.702(i). The second is that the build…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Fla. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. COX, 943 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …ay, combining with the fire damage to render the structure a total loss: Municipal authorities refused to allow repair of the building, adjudging it a hazard, and ordered its demolition instead. See also Regency Baptist Temple v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 352 So. 2d 1242, 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (distinguishing Fowler from cases involving nothing but a partial loss, while agreeing with the rule in Fowler). The insurance company in Fowler argued that the fire damage could have been repaired, so that the total loss…
• Reliance Ins. Co. v. Harris, 503 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …not have been a total loss but for Harris’ failure to repair or replace the building, or to otherwise mitigate the damages as allegedly required in paragraph 1(b) of the policy. Citing to Regency Baptist Temple v. Insurance Company of North America, 352 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), Reliance maintains that Harris was not entitled to recover those costs arising directly or indirectly by enforcement of a local ordinance or building code, thereby referring to the city’s decision to demolish the building. We d…